Specification
| Item | Nominal | Decision, and what it cost |
|---|---|---|
| Span, spread | 34.2 m | Set by the wing needed to get off a short strip at this mass, before the hangar was considered at all. |
| Span, folded | 19.6 m | The hangar door is the constraint. The outer panel folds up and inboard, hinge at the second rib. |
| Field length | 780 m | The whole reason for the drooped intake lip and the oversized flap. It costs at the top end, which is not what this is for. |
| Empty mass | 22 400 kg | Anchored to the gear bay volume and the fold hardware, nothing more. A guess with a reason. |
| Crew | 2 | Two, because the loading job needs a second pair of eyes. It costs a second door. |
Revision block
| Rev | Date | Change | Credit |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2026-09-20 | First issue. Figure is a render; the wrong detail is named on the sheet. | the studio |
What this page is and is not
These numbers are choices, not results. Nothing on this site was manufactured, loaded, wind tunnelled or flown, and no real manufacturer, operator, airfield or aircraft is named anywhere on it.
The render on sheet one does NOT match this table, and flagnote two says so on the sheet: the wing root reads too thin for this span. A picture generated in one pass is not a drawing measured against a table, and pretending otherwise is the exact failure this site is built to avoid.
If a number here is impossible, that is worth an email: it becomes a revision with the date and the name of whoever spotted it, in the block above.